4.2 Article

Development of tools to facilitate palliative and supportive care referral for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Journal

BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 340-346

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001330

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Palliative care is underused in non-malignant respiratory diseases, including interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We investigated current practices around palliative and supportive care and explored the impact of a supportive care decision aid tool. Methods This was a single centre study in a UK ILD centre. Retrospective analysis of hospice referrals and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) under the Bristol ILD (BILD) service were used to identify unmet palliative and supportive care needs. Using quality improvement methodology, we explored the impact of a supportive care decision aid on clinician behaviours for patients with ILD. Results 108 patients with ILD were referred for hospice care between 2010 and 2015, representing 0.15% of all referrals, compared with a population prevalence of IPF of 0.9%. The median interval between referral and death was 124 days. Records were reviewed for 64 deceased and 8(living patients with IPF seen on July-December 2014. The decision aid was prospectively assessed with 73 patients. The deceased patients had greater markers of severity. There were no other differences between the groups. After introduction, the decision aid tool was completed for 49.3% of patients and resulted in significant increases in documented discussion of referral to palliative care (11.2% vs53.6%, p<0.01) and end-of-life discussions (15.7% vs91.8%, p<0.01). Tool completion led to an increase in referral for palliative care (2.7% vs16.7%, p<0.01). Conclusion Palliative care services are underused in ILD and a supportive care decision aid can prompt consideration of palliative and supportive care needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available