4.6 Article

QUASI-PERIODIC PULSATIONS DURING THE IMPULSIVE AND DECAY PHASES OF AN X-CLASS FLARE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 827, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L30

Keywords

Sun: flares; Sun: oscillations; Sun: X-rays, gamma rays

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council (IRC)
  2. Solar-Terrestrial Centre of Excellence
  3. SIDC Data Exploitation
  4. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quasi-periodic pulsations (QPPs) are often observed in X-ray emission from solar flares. To date, it is unclear what their physical origins are. Here, we present a multi-instrument investigation of the nature of QPP during the impulsive and decay phases of the X1.0 flare of 2013 October 28. We focus on the character of the fine structure pulsations evident in the soft X-ray (SXR) time derivatives and compare this variability with structure across multiple wavelengths including hard X-ray and microwave emission. We find that during the impulsive phase of the flare, high correlations between pulsations in the thermal and non-thermal emissions are seen. A characteristic timescale of similar to 20 s is observed in all channels and a second timescale of similar to 55 s is observed in the non-thermal emissions. SXR pulsations are seen to persist into the decay phase of this flare, up to 20 minutes after the non-thermal emission has ceased. We find that these decay phase thermal pulsations have very small amplitude and show an increase in characteristic timescale from similar to 40 s up to similar to 70 s. We interpret the bursty nature of the coexisting multi-wavelength QPPs during the impulsive phase in terms of episodic particle acceleration and plasma heating. The persistent thermal decay phase QPPs are most likely connected with compressive magnetohydrodynamic processes in the post-flare loops such as the fast sausage mode or the vertical kink mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available