Journal
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 917-928Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12313
Keywords
end-of-life management; extended producer responsibility (EPR); industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); mattresses and boxsprings; reuse and recycling
Categories
Funding
- CalRecycle
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation in the United States, which currently only exists on the state level, now includes three mattress EPR acts, which intend to shift the financial and operational burden of mattress end-of-life (EOL) management away from local and state government. It is important to keep in mind, however, that the original objective behind EPR is to reduce the environmental life cycle impacts of products. This article therefore quantifies the greenhouse gas (GHG) savings potential of mattress and boxspring recycling and reuse in the United States and also discusses labor implications and mattress design issues. We find that all three acts are unlikely to generate redesign incentives, but are expected to dramatically increase mattress collection and recycling. The collection and recycling of all 35 million EOL mattress and boxspring units estimated to reach the end of their lives in the United States every year would generate in the order of 10,000 jobs and GHG savings between 1 and 1.5 million metric tonnes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available