4.7 Article

The impact of resolving the Rossby radius at mid-latitudes in the ocean: results from a high-resolution version of the Met Office GC2 coupled model

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 3655-3670

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3655-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  2. NERC
  3. EU FP7 IS-ENES2 project
  4. NERC [noc010010] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is mounting evidence that resolving mesoscale eddies and western boundary currents as well as topographically controlled flows can play an important role in air-sea interaction associated with vertical and lateral transports of heat and salt. Here we describe the development of the Met Office Global Coupled Model version 2 (GC2) with increased resolution relative to the standard model: the ocean resolution is increased from 1/4 to 1/12 degrees (28 to 9 km at the Equator), the atmosphere resolution increased from 60 km (N216) to 25 km (N512) and the coupling period reduced from 3 hourly to hourly. The technical developments that were required to build a version of the model at higher resolution are described as well as results from a 20-year simulation. The results demonstrate the key role played by the enhanced resolution of the ocean model: reduced sea surface temperature (SST) biases, improved ocean heat transports, deeper and stronger overturning circulation and a stronger Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Our results suggest that the improvements seen here require high resolution in both atmosphere and ocean components as well as high-frequency coupling. These results add to the body of evidence suggesting that ocean resolution is an important consideration when developing coupled models for weather and climate applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available