4.7 Article

A Breathable and Screen-Printed Pressure Sensor Based on Nanofiber Membranes for Electronic Skins

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.201700241

Keywords

air permeability; electronic skins; nanofiber membranes; screen printing; skin-like pressure sensors

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Project from the Minister of Science and Technology, China [2016YFA0202702, 2016YFA0202703]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21274006, 21703010, 51503005]
  3. Programs for Beijing Science and Technology Leading Talent [Z16111000490000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, skin-like pressure sensors with high sensitivity and excellent flexibility are widely demonstrated for electronic skins. However, most of the reported skin-like pressure sensors are still based on airtight films, resulting in limited air permeability. Herein, cost-effective and capable processes of large-scale production are reported for lightweight and breathable pressure sensors based on nanofiber membranes (NM). The pressure sensor is composed of a layer-by-layer structure of poly(vinylidene fluoride) NM for substrates, silver nanowires for electrodes, and thermoplastic polyurethane NM for the dielectric layer through screen printing and ultrasonic bonding techniques. Benefiting from the high porosity of NM, the capacitive pressure sensor possesses unique performance, including a superior sensitivity of 4.2 kPa(-1), a fast response time (<26 ms), an ultralow detection limit (1.6 Pa), and excellent breathability (Gurley value = 17.3 s/100 mL). Furthermore, the pressure sensor is not only applicable to monitor human physiological signals, but also to detect spatial pressure distribution. These results indicate that the breathable and screen-print pressure sensor is promising for electronic skins with air permeability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available