4.7 Article

The effect of viscosity and diffusion on the HO2 uptake by sucrose and secondary organic aerosol particles

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages 13035-13047

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-13035-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/F020651/1]
  2. Max Planck Graduate Center
  3. Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz (MPGC)
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [149492, CR3213-140851]
  5. NERC [NE/F020651/1, ncas10006] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10006, NE/F020651/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the first measurements of HO2 uptake coefficients, gamma, for secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles and for the well-studied model compound sucrose which we doped with copper(II). Above 65% relative humidity (RH), gamma for copper(II)-doped sucrose aerosol particles equalled the surface mass accommodation coefficient alpha = 0.22 +/- 0.06, but it decreased to gamma = 0.012 +/- 0.007 upon decreasing the RH to 17 %. The trend of gamma with RH can be explained by an increase in aerosol viscosity and the contribution of a surface reaction, as demonstrated using the kinetic multilayer model of aerosol surface and bulk chemistry (KM-SUB). At high RH the total uptake was driven by reaction in the near-surface bulk and limited by mass accommodation, whilst at low RH it was limited by surface reaction. SOA from two different precursors, alpha-pinene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB), was investigated, yielding low uptake coefficients of gamma < 0.001 and gamma = 0.004 +/- 0.002, respectively. It is postulated that the larger values measured for TMB-derived SOA compared to alpha-pinene-derived SOA are either due to differing viscosity, a different liquid water content of the aerosol particles, or an HO2 + RO2 reaction occurring within the aerosol particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available