4.7 Review

Nutritional Psychiatry: Where to Next?

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 24-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.02.020

Keywords

Diet; Nutrition; Depression; Psychosis; Mental disorder; Neurodevelopment; Neurodegenerative; Nutraceutical; Prevention; Treatment

Funding

  1. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1121510, 1021347, 1021345, 1026265]
  2. Australian Rotary Health
  3. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  4. Ian Potter Foundation
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Meat and Livestock Board [D.MHN.0610]
  7. Woolworths Limited
  8. University of Melbourne
  9. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (2) [1108125]
  10. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1121510, 1021347, 1021345, 1026265]
  11. Australian Rotary Health
  12. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  13. Ian Potter Foundation
  14. Eli Lilly
  15. Meat and Livestock Board [D.MHN.0610]
  16. Woolworths Limited
  17. University of Melbourne
  18. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (2) [1108125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nascent field of `Nutritional Psychiatry' offers much promise for addressing the large disease burden associated with mental disorders. A consistent evidence base from the observational literature confirms that the quality of individuals' diets is related to their risk for common mental disorders, such as depression. This is the case across countries and age groups. Moreover, new intervention studies implementing dietary changes suggest promise for the prevention and treatment of depression. Concurrently, data point to the utility of selected nutraceuticals as adjunctive treatments for mental disorders and as monotherapies for conditions such as ADHD. Finally, new studies focused on understanding the biological pathways that mediate the observed relationships between diet, nutrition and mental health are pointing to the immune system, oxidative biology, brain plasticity and the microbiome-gut-brain axis as key targets for nutritional interventions. On the other hand, the field is currently limited by a lack of data and methodological issues such as heterogeneity, residual confounding, measurement error, and challenges in measuring and ensuring dietary adherence in intervention studies. Key challenges for the field are to now: replicate, refine and scale up promising clinical and population level dietary strategies; identify a clear set of biological pathways and targets that mediate the identified associations; conduct scientifically rigorous nutraceutical and `psychobiotic' interventions that also examine predictors of treatment response; conduct observational and experimental studies in psychosis focused on dietary and related risk factors and treatments; and continue to advocate for policy change to improve the food environment at the population level. (C) 2017 The Author( s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available