4.6 Article

Absolute Rates of Heart Failure, Coronary Heart Disease, and Stroke in Chronic Kidney Disease An Analysis of 3 Community-Based Cohort Studies

Journal

JAMA CARDIOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 314-318

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4652

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Washington [R01HL096875, UH2HL125122, R01DK102134, K23DK088865]
  2. Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201300047C, HHSN268201300048C, HHSN268201300049C, HHSN268201300050C, HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C]
  4. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  5. National Institute on Aging [AG023629]
  6. National Center for Research Resources [UL1-TR-000040, UL1-RR-025005]
  7. [N01 HC55222]
  8. [N01HC85079]
  9. [N01HC85080]
  10. [N01HC85081]
  11. [N01HC85082]
  12. [N01HC85083]
  13. [N01HC85086]
  14. [HL080295]
  15. [N01-HC-95159]
  16. [N01-HC-95160]
  17. [N01-HC-95161]
  18. [N01-HC-95162]
  19. [N01-HC-95163]
  20. [N01-HC-95164]
  21. [N01-HC-95165]
  22. [N01-HC-95166]
  23. [N01-HC-95167]
  24. [N01-HC-95168]
  25. [N01-HC-95169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Understanding the relative contributions of cardiovascular disease event types to the excess burden of cardiovascular disease is important for developing effective strategies to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine absolute rates and risk differences of incident heart failure (HF), coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke in participants with vs without CKD. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We pooled participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease from 3 community-based cohort studies: the Jackson Heart Study, Cardiovascular Health Study, and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. The Jackson Heart Study was conducted between 2000 and 2010, the Cardiovascular Health Study was conducted between 1989 and 2003, and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis was conducted between 2000 and 2012. EXPOSURES Chronic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73m(2), calculated using the combined creatinine-cystatin C CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration Equation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rates (IRs) and risk differences of adjudicated incident HF, CHD, and stroke, comparing participants with vs without CKD. RESULTS Among 14 462 participants, the mean (SD) age was 63 (12) years, 59%(n = 8533) were women, and 44%(n = 6363) were African American. Overall, 1461 (10%) had CKD (mean [SD] estimated glomerular filtration rate, 49 [10] mL/min/1.73m2). Unadjusted IRs for participants with and without CKD, respectively, were 22.0 (95% CI, 19.3-24.8) and 6.2 (95% CI, 5.8-6.7) per 1000 person-years for HF; 24.5 (95% CI, 21.6-27.5) and 8.4 (95% CI, 7.9-9.0) per 1000 person-years for CHD; and 13.4 (95% CI, 11.3-15.5) and 4.8 (95% CI, 4.4-5.3) for stroke. Adjusting for demographics, cohort, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use, risk differences comparing participants with vs without CKD (per 1000 person-years) were 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2-3.3) for HF, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2-3.4) for CHD, and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.09-1.5) for stroke. Among African American and Hispanic participants, adjusted risk differences comparing participants with vs without CKD for HF were 3.5 (95% CI, 1.5-5.5) and 7.8 (95% CI, 2.2-13.3) per 1000 person-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among 3 diverse community-based cohorts, CKDwas associated with an increased risk of HF that was similar in magnitude to CHD and greater than stroke. The excess risk of HF associated with CKD was particularly large among African American and Hispanic individuals. Efforts to improve health outcomes for patients with CKD should prioritize HF in addition to CHD prevention. Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available