Journal
JAMA ONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 256-259Publisher
AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3015
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer [P5OCA19653O]
- Yale Cancer Center [P3OCAO16359]
- Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- Genoptix
Ask authors/readers for more resources
IMPORTANCE Assessment of PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) expression by immunohistochemical analysis has been used as a predictive diagnostic test to identify responders and guide treatment in trials of the PD-1 (programmed cell death 1) axis inhibitors. The definition of PD-L1 positive lacks standardization, and prediction of response by immunohistochemical analysis is additionally limited by the subjective nature of this technique. OBJECTIVE To examine whether PD-L1 antibody reagents are interchangeable by quantitatively comparing the expression of the PD-L1 protein. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this immunohistochemistry standardization study, 30 randomly selected cases of lung cancer resected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009, were obtained from Yale Pathology Archives with a range of expression of PD-L1. To test for protein measurement, rather than clinical utility, a PD-L1 index tissue microarray, including cell line and tissue controls, was used. The results were then validated on a commercially available, genetically defined PD-L1 engineered cell line array with a range of controlled protein-expressing cell lines using 6 monoclonal antibodies (SP142, E1L3N, 9A11, SP263, 22c3, and 28-8). Protein levels were measured by quantitative immunofluorescence and quantitative chromogenic assessment. Data analysis was performed from September 2015 through May 2016. RESULTS Concordance between 4 antibodies revealed regression for tumor tissue cores (R-2 = 0.42-0.91) and cell line cores (R-2 = 0.83-0.97) by quantitative immunofluorescence in the PD-L1 index tissue microarray. All 6 antibodies had high levels of concordance (R-2 = 0.76-0.99) when using chromogenic staining in isogenic cell lines. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Because the antibodies are highly concordant, these results suggest that assays based on the use of these antibodies could yield concordant results. They further suggest that previously described differences in PD-L1 expression in tissue are independent of the antibody used and likely attributable to tumor heterogeneity, assay- or platform-specific variables, or other factors.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available