3.8 Article

The Fiction of Sovereignty and the Real State of Exception: Giorgio Agamben's Critique of Carl Schmitt

Journal

LAW CULTURE AND THE HUMANITIES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 509-528

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1743872112469863

Keywords

Agamben; Benjamin; Schmitt; Kafka; St; Paul; sovereignty; State; state of exception; state of emergency; messianism; anomie; inoperative

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agamben is perhaps best known for his analysis of the logic of sovereignty drawn from Carl Schmitt. This article examines the critique of sovereignty that Agamben develops through his reading of Walter Benjamin's messianism. For Agamben, Schmitt's analysis of sovereignty claims that the state of exception is a juridical condition, in that the law survives its suspension in the form of the force-of-< strike > law . Drawing on Benjamin, Agamben argues that overeignty is a fiction that covers over the originary inoperativity of the law and the illegitimacy of authority. The purpose of Agamben's analysis is to open space for a new understanding of the relationship between law and political action that responds to the contemporary crisis of tradition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available