4.7 Review

Cucurbitacins: A Systematic Review of the Phytochemistry and Anticancer Activity

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 1331-1350

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X15500755

Keywords

Cucurbitacins; Phytochemistry; Anticancer; Mechanism

Funding

  1. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [102/2012/A3]
  2. Research Fund of the University of Macau [MYRG2014-00033-ICMS-QRCM, MYRG2014-00051-ICMS-QRCM, MYRG2015-00171-ICMS-QRCM]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81403120, 81473433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cucurbitacins are highly oxidized tetracyclic triterpenoids that are widely present in traditional Chinese medicines (Cucurbitaceae family), possess strong anticancer activity, and are divided into 12 classes from A to T with over 200 derivatives. The eight most active cucurbitacin components against cancer are cucurbitacin B, D, E, I, IIa, L glucoside, Q, and R. Their mechanisms of action include antiproliferation, inhibition of migration and invasion, proapoptosis, and cell cycle arrest promotion. Cucurbitacins are also found to be the inhibitors of JAK-STAT3, Wnt, PI3K/Akt, and MAPK signaling pathways, which play important roles in the apoptosis and survival of cancer cells. Recently, new studies have discovered synergistic anticancer effects by using cucurbitacins together with clinically approved chemotherapeutic drugs, such as docetaxel and methotrexate. This paper provides a summary of recent research progress on the anticancer property of cucurbitacins and the various intracellular signaling pathways involved in the regulation of cancer cell proliferation, death, invasion, and migration. Therefore, cucurbitacins are a class of promising anticancer drugs to be used alone or be intergraded in current chemotherapies and radiotherapies to treat many types of cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available