4.5 Article

Quantification of diverse virus populations in the environment using the polony method

Journal

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-017-0045-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Council FP6 Marie Curie Reintegration grant [046549]
  2. Israel Science Foundation Individual grant [749/11]
  3. European Research Council Consolidator Grant [646868]
  4. Mallat Family Fund from the Technion
  5. Cullen Fund from the Technion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Viruses are globally abundant and extremely diverse in their genetic make-up and in the hosts they infect. Although they influence the abundance, diversity and evolution of their hosts, current methods are inadequate for gaining a quantitative understanding of their impact on these processes. Here we report the adaptation of the solid-phase single-molecule PCR polony method for the quantification of taxonomically relevant groups of diverse viruses. Using T7-like cyanophages as our model, we found the polony method to be far superior to regular quantitative PCR methods and droplet digital PCR when degenerate primers were used to encompass the group's diversity. This method revealed that T7-like cyanophages were highly abundant in the Red Sea in spring 2013, reaching 770,000 phages ml(-1), and displaying a similar depth distribution pattern to cyanobacteria. Furthermore, the abundances of two major clades within the T7-like cyanophages differed dramatically throughout the water column: clade B phages that carry the psbA photosynthesis gene and infect either Synechococcus or Prochlorococcus were at least 20-fold more abundant than clade A phages that lack psbA and infect Synechococcus hosts. Such measurements are of paramount importance for understanding virus population dynamics and the impact of viruses on different microbial taxa and for modelling viral influence on ecosystem functioning on a global scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available