4.7 Article

FORMATION OF ANOMALOUS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS WITH METALLICITY SPREADS: A UNIFIED PICTURE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 831, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/70

Keywords

galaxies: star clusters: general; galaxies: stellar content; globular clusters: general; stars: formation

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [15K05033]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K05033] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations have revealed that at least eight globular clusters (GCs) in the Galaxy show internal abundance spreads in [Fe/H]. We investigate the origin of these anomalous GCs using numerical simulations of GCs in the dwarfs orbiting around the Galaxy and chemical evolution model of the dwarfs hosting the GCs. The principal results are as follows. GCs formed in a host dwarf galaxy with a total mass of similar to 1010 M-circle dot can merge to form a single nuclear GC before the host is completely destroyed by the Galaxy, if they are massive (> 3 x 10(5) M-circle dot) and if they are formed in the inner region (R < 400 pc). The GC merger remnants can capture field stars during its spiral-in to nuclear regions. If two GCs are formed from star formation events separated by similar to 300 Myr in their host dwarf, then the new GC formed from GC merging can have a [Fe/H] spread of 0.2 dex and a [Ba/Fe] spread of 0.3 dex. GCs formed from GC merging can show a variety of internal abundance spreads depending on the details of their hosts' chemical evolution. We suggest that anomalous GCs were formed from GC merging that occurred before the destruction of GC host dwarfs, yet after self-enrichment processes responsible for the observed anti-correlations between chemical abundances of light elements. We also suggest that the observed no/little dependence of [Eu/Fe] on [Fe/H] in the Galactic GC M22 is evidence of massive dwarf galaxies hosting these anomalous GCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available