4.4 Article

Aromaticity, the Huckel 4n+2 Rule and Magnetic Current

Journal

CHEMISTRYSELECT
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 863-870

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201602080

Keywords

Aromaticity; Giambiagi multicenter index I-NG; Huckel rule; Magnetically induced ring current; NICS calculations

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Eusko Jaurlaritza (Basque Government)
  3. Spanish Office for Scientific Research [IT588-13, CTQ2012-38496-C05-01, CTQ2015-67660-P]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  5. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT)
  6. CESNET [LM2015042]
  7. CERIT Scientific Cloud [LM2015085]
  8. Nanjing Tech University
  9. Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory and correlated ab initio methods of the 10 pi-electron systems (N6H6)(2+) and C2N4H6 show that the planar forms are no minima on the potential energy surfaces. The twisted ring structures of the two species are energy minima, but acyclic isomers are much lower in energy. The planar geometries sustain strong diamagnetic ring current comparable with that of benzene. In contrast, the calculated multicenter normalized Giambiagi electron delocalization index ING suggests that pi- delocalization in planar (N6H6)(2+) and C2N4H6 is much weaker than in benzene. Since aromaticity is synonymous for a particular stability of cyclic delocalized systems, it may be stated that calculation or measurement of magnetic chemical shifts due to induced ring currents is not a reliable method to ascertain the aromatic character of a molecule. Aromatic compounds exhibit ring current induced magnetic shielding, but the reverse conclusion that ring current induced magnetic shielding identifies aromaticity is not justified. Furthermore, the 4n+ 2 rule as indicator of aromatic stabilization should only be used in conjunction with the ring size; the nature of the occupied pi orbitals must always be examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available