Journal
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 545-570Publisher
SOC CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
DOI: 10.14506/ca31.4.05
Keywords
ontological politics; cosmopolitics; alterity; science and technology studies; political ontology; Innu; caribou
Categories
Funding
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The concept of cosmopolitics developed by Isabelle Stengers and Bruno Latour keeps open the question of who and what might compose the common world. In this way, cosmopolitics offers a way to avoid the pitfalls of reasonable politics, a politics that, defining in advance that the differences at stake in a disagreement are between perspectives on a single reality, makes it possible to sideline some concerns by deeming them unrealistic and, therefore, unreasonable or irrelevant. Figuring the common world as its possible result, rather than as a starting point, cosmopolitics disrupts the quick recourse to ruling out concerns on the basis of their ostensible lack of reality. And yet, questions remain as to who and what can participate in the composition of the common world. Exploring these questions through ethnographical materials on a conflict around caribou in Labrador, I argue that a cosmopolitics oriented to the common world has important limitations and that another orientation might be possible as well.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available