4.6 Article

CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 787-806

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2467-2

Keywords

CEO turnover; Corporate fraud; Ownership; Split Share Structure Reform; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use institutional-related theories and a unique natural experiment that enables an exogenous test of the influence of controlling shareholders on managerial accountability to corporate fraud. In China, prior to the Split Share Structure Reform (SSSR), state shareholders held restricted shares that could not be traded. This restriction mitigated state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders' incentives to monitor managers. The data examined show the SSSR strengthens incentives of state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders to replace fraudulent management. Our findings support the view that economic incentives are important to promote corporate governance and deter fraud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available