4.5 Article

SUPPLY CHAIN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ACROSS NATIONAL CULTURES

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 68-82

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12101

Keywords

behavioral supply management; human judgment and decision making; buyer/supplier relationships; laboratory study; factor analysis; regression analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Project Achievement of the Collaborative Innovation Center for China's Multinational Enterprise [201501YY002B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supply disruptions are commonplace in today's global supply chain environment. The sheer magnitude of daily transactions makes it inevitable that there will be disruptions, further exacerbated by differences in cultural norms and attitudes that add a layer of complexity to managerial response. In this research, we examine the impact of national culture on individuals' responses to supply disruptions due to psychological contract breach. Using data from controlled experiments conducted with 158 subjects in China and 125 subjects in the U.S., we evaluate changes in decision-making behaviors and assessments of attitudinal outcomes regarding trust and repurchase intentions. Our results show post-breach behavioral differences based on national culture, but find that these differences are short-term in nature. Additionally, cultural differences show up in both of the attitudinal outcomes assessed in this research. Following a psychological contract breach, individuals from the U.S. express less trust in their supply chain partner and less willingness to work with that partner again in the future as compared to individuals from China. Our research suggests that managers and scholars interested in the cultural influences on the response to supply disruption will benefit from further research and understanding focusing on the intersection of psychological contract breach and cultural distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available