4.6 Article

Charge-Discharge Properties of a Sn4P3 Negative Electrode in Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for Na-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 1139-1143

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00252

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program (ALGA)
  2. Joint Usage/Research Program on Zero-Emission Energy Research
  3. Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto University [ZE27A-10, ZE28A-21]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17H03128, 17K17888, 16K05954]
  5. Advanced Characterization Nanotechnology Platform, Nanotechnology Platform Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan at the Research Center
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H03128, 16K05954, 17K17888] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the chargedischarge performance of a Sn4P3 negative electrode in an ionic liquid electrolyte comprised of N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide (Py13-FSA) and NaFSA. We also conducted cyclic voltammetry and transmission electron microscopy for the Sn4P3 electrode to reveal the reaction mechanism. It was suggested that Na15Sn4 and Na3P are formed via phase separation in the first sodiation and that elemental Sn and elemental P formed by following a desodiation reaction with Na ions in the subsequent cycles. The Sn4P3 electrode exhibited a high Coulombic efficiency of 99.1% at the fourth cycle and an excellent cycling performance with a high reversible capacity of 750 mA h g(1) even at the 200th cycle. We demonstrated that there are two important factors to improve the performance: (i) higher volume fraction of Sn than P and (ii) uniform dispersion of Sn nanoparticles in a P matrix. The ionic liquid electrolyte showed good applicability to the Sn4P3 negative electrode due to its superior electrochemical stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available