4.2 Article

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of prazosin versus placebo for the treatment of nightmares and sleep disturbances in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & DISSOCIATION
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 494-510

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2016.1141150

Keywords

Nightmares; posttraumatic stress disorder; prazosin; sleep disturbance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although sleep disturbances occur commonly in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and are associated with adverse outcomes and increased suicidality, they are often inadequately addressed by antidepressant medications. Objective: This review aims to assess whether prazosin reduces nightmares, sleep disturbances, and illness severity in adults with PTSD. Method: Electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO) were searched in September 2014 for randomized controlled trials in adults. Search terms included posttraumatic stress disorder, prazosin, nightmares, and sleep disturbance. Included studies used prazosin and provided objective outcome data related to nightmares and/or sleep quality. Results: Six studies (191 participants) met the criteria for inclusion. Prazosin was more effective than placebo in improving nightmares (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.41, 1.62], p = .001), sleep quality (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI [-0.02, 1.88], p = .054; and SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 2.03], p = .01), and illness severity (SMD = 1.20, 95% CI [0.79, 1.61], p = .001, with no significant effect on systolic (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.40, 0.37], p = .94) or diastolic (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.68], p = .154) blood pressure. Conclusion: PTSD-related nightmares, sleep disturbances, and overall illness severity showed a significant response to treatment with prazosin. With careful dose titration, prazosin was well tolerated and had no significant sustained effect on blood pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available