4.1 Article

Incidence of asparaginase-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and thrombotic events in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with a pediatric-inspired regimen

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 299-308

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1078155217701291

Keywords

Asparaginase; thrombosis; hepatotoxicity; pancreatitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asparaginase is a critical component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment in children; however, its use in adults is often avoided as a result of toxicities including hepatotoxicity, thrombosis, and pancreatitis which have been reported more commonly in adults than in children. In this retrospective analysis, short-acting L-asparaginase (L-ASP) and long-acting polyethylene glycol (PEG)-asparaginase (PEG-ASP) were compared for grade 3-4 toxicities and characterized by patient and drug-related factors to identify strategies for toxicity avoidance in adults with ALL. Asparaginase was administered during sequential courses of chemotherapy using a pediatric-inspired treatment regimen. Forty-eight patients who received PEG-ASP and nine patients who received L-ASP were identified. The rates of toxicity were as follows for the PEG-ASP and L-ASP groups, respectively: hepatotoxicity (60% vs. 33%, P=0.275), pancreatitis (17% vs. 22%, P=0.650), thrombosis (19.0% vs. 0%, P=0.328), or any grade 3-4 toxicity (71% vs. 44%, P=0.143). Toxicity did not correlate with dose, either by individual dose based on flat or BSA-based measures. Logistic regression identified obesity as a risk factor for heptatotoxicity (OR=8.44, 95% CI: 1.395-51.117). Hypofibrinogenemia was identified as a pharmacodynamic marker for predicting hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, grade 3-4 toxicity was not statistically different between adult ALL patients receiving PEG-ASP and L-ASP, but toxicity was strongly associated with obesity and hypofibrinogenemia, not dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available