4.7 Article

Pedestrian exposure to traffic PM on different types of urban roads: A case study of Xi'an, China

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages 475-485

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.007

Keywords

Pedestrian exposure; Typical urban roadways; PM mass and particle number concentrations; Meteorological parameters; Principal component analysis

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [310822173702, 310822152006]
  2. Science and Technology Project of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development of the People's Republic of China [2016-K2-032]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21607014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the pedestrian exposure to fine particulate on various typical urban roadways, mass concentration of PM10, PM2.5, PM1 and particle number concentrations in the given size distribution were obtained at four types of urban roads in Xi'an City: urban expressway, arterial road, collector road, and local road. The principal component analysis (PCA) was used. Measurement and analysis results showed that the mean particle number concentration for the size range of 0.25-32 mu m on the urban expressway was 9%, 29% and 32% higher than those on the arterial road, the collector road and the local road, respectively. However, the mass concentration of particles, especially for PM2.5 and PM1, varied little. Traffic volumes on the urban expressway, the collector road and the local road all had important influences on PM particle-number concentration, but at different size ranges. Additionally, the results discussion indicated that PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were generated from the same emission source(i.e. vehicles) on the urban expressway, yet on the other types of roads PM (especially PM10 and PM1) emissions were generated from different sources (i. e. vehicles, pedestrians, or road dust).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available