4.6 Review

Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: an international review of empirical studies

Journal

TRANSPORT REVIEWS
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 772-792

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1168887

Keywords

Transport infrastructure networks; land-use change; road; rail; long-term impacts

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under the Urban Europe Joint Programming Initiative [438-12-458]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improvements in geographical information systems, the wider availability of high-resolution digital data and more sophisticated econometric techniques have all contributed to increasing academic interest and activity in long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks (TINs) on land use (LU). This paper provides a systematic review of recent empirical evidence from the USA, Europe and East Asia, classified regarding the type of transport infrastructure (road or rail), LU indicator (land cover, population or employment density, development type) and outcome (significance, relationship's direction) as well as influential exogenous factors. Proximity to the rail network is generally associated with population growth (particularly soon after the development of railway infrastructure), conversion to residential uses and the development of higher residential densities. Meanwhile, proximity to the road network is frequently associated with increases in employment densities as well as the conversion of land to a variety of urban uses including commercial and industrial development. Compared with road infrastructure, the impact of rail infrastructure is often less significant for land cover or population and employment density change. The extent of TINs' impact on LU over time can be explained by the saturation in TIN-related accessibility and LU development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available