4.7 Article

FIRST DETECTION OF A PULSAR BOW SHOCK NEBULA IN FAR-UV: PSR J0437-4715

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 831, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/129

Keywords

ISM: jets and outflows; pulsars: individual (PSR J0437-4715); shock waves; ultraviolet: ISM; X-rays: individual (PWN J0437-4715)

Funding

  1. NASA through grants from the Space Telescope Science Institute [GO 12917, GO 10568]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  3. RSF [16-12-10225]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [16-12-10225] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulsars traveling at supersonic speeds are often accompanied by cometary bow shocks seen in H alpha. We report on the first detection of a pulsar bow shock in the far-ultraviolet (FUV). We detected it in FUV images of the nearest millisecond pulsar J0437-4715 obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope. The images reveal a bow-like structure positionally coincident with part of the previously detected Ha bow shock, with an apex at 10 '' ahead of the moving pulsar. Its FUV luminosity, L(1250-2000 angstrom) approximate to 5 x 10(28) erg s(-1), exceeds the Ha luminosity from the same area by a factor of 10. The FUV emission could be produced by the shocked interstellar medium matter or, less likely, by relativistic pulsar wind electrons confined by strong magnetic field fluctuations in the bow shock. In addition, in the FUV images we found a puzzling extended (similar or equal to 3 '' in size) structure overlapping with the limb of the bow shock. If related to the bow shock, it could be produced by an inhomogeneity in the ambient medium or an instability in the bow shock. We also report on a previously undetected X-ray emission extending for about 5 '' ahead of the pulsar, possibly a pulsar wind nebula created by shocked pulsar wind, with a luminosity L(0.5-8 keV) similar to 3 x 10(28) erg s(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available