4.6 Article

Evaluation and analysis of AMSR-2, SMOS, and SMAP soil moisture products in the Genhe area of China

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 122, Issue 16, Pages 8650-8666

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026800

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB733406, 2015CB953701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371354, 41671334]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-precision soil moisture products play an important role in estimating forest carbon storage and carbon emissions in Genhe, China. In this paper, we evaluated the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) L3 product, the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) L3 product, and four soil moisture products derived from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR-2), i.e., the Dual Channel Algorithm based on the Qp model (QDCA) product, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) L3 product, and the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM) C band and X band products in the Genhe area of China. The results indicated that the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and bias of the QDCA product were lower than those of the other AMSR-2 products, although the QDCA still fell outside of the acceptable range with a volumetric error of no greater than 6%. The JAXA product underestimated the soil moisture and had a constant bias of 0.089-0.099 m(3) m(-3). The LPRM C-band and X-band products had a constant variable season bias of 0.261-0.576 m(3) m(-3). The quality of the SMOS was better than that of the AMSR-2 products; however, the results were noisy and unstable. The SMAP was closest to the ground measurements and presented a low RMSE (0.039-0.063 m(3) m(-3)) and bias (0.022-0.050 m(3) m(-3)). Finally, an assessment was performed on the parameters in these soil moisture algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available