4.5 Article

Comparison of two closed-path cavity-based spectrometers for measuring air-water CO2 and CH4 fluxes by eddy covariance

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 5509-5522

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-5509-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council, UK
  2. Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans (POGO) programme
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N018095/1, pml010009, pml010002, noc010012, NE/N015932/1, pml010007] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [pml010007, pml010002, NE/N018028/1, NE/N015932/1, pml010009, NE/N018095/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years several commercialised closedpath cavity-based spectroscopic instruments designed for eddy covariance flux measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and water vapour (H2O) have become available. Here we compare the performance of two leading models - the Picarro G2311-f and the Los Gatos Research (LGR) Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer (FGGA) at a coastal site. Both instruments can compute dry mixing ratios of CO2 and CH4 based on concurrently measured H2O, temperature, and pressure. Additionally, we used a high throughput Nafion dryer to physically remove H2O from the Picarro airstream. Observed air-sea CO2 and CH4 fluxes from these two analysers, averaging about 12 and 0.12 mmol m(-2) day 1 respectively, agree within the measurement uncertainties. For the purpose of quantifying dry CO2 and CH4 fluxes downstream of a long inlet, the numerical H2O corrections appear to be reasonably effective and lead to results that are comparable to physical removal of H2O with a Nafion dryer in the mean. We estimate the high-frequency attenuation of fluxes in our closed-path set-up, which was relatively small (<= 10 %) for CO2 and CH4 but very large for the more polar H2O. The Picarro showed significantly lower noise and flux detection limits than the LGR. The hourly flux detection limit for the Picarro was about 2 mmol m(-2) day(-1) for CO2 and 0.02 mmol m(-2) day(-1) for CH4. For the LGR these detection limits were about 8 and 0.05 mmol m(-2) day(-1). Using global maps of monthly mean air-sea CO2 flux as reference, we estimate that the Picarro and LGR can resolve hourly CO2 fluxes from roughly 40 and 4% of the world's oceans respectively. Averaging over longer timescales would be required in regions with smaller fluxes. Hourly flux detection limits of CH4 from both instruments are generally higher than the expected emissions from the open ocean, though the signal to noise of this measurement may improve closer to the coast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available