Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
Feng Li et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2014)
Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease
Guangfei Gu et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2014)
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): Surgical Technique, Long-Term 4-year Prospective Outcomes, and Complications Compared with an Open TLIF Cohort
Albert P. Wong et al.
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2014)
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Kern Singh et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2014)
Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis
Scott L. Parker et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2014)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
Nai-Feng Tian et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year follow-up
Javier Rodriguez-Vela et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis
Eleftherios Archavlis et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?
Jason S. Cheng et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2013)
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients
Darryl Lau et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2013)
Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Matched-Pair Comparison Study
Chusheng Seng et al.
SPINE (2013)
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Open and Mini-Open Approaches with Two Years Follow-Up
F. Zairi et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY (2013)
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Long-term Outcome, Morbidity, and the Learning Curve From the First 50 Cases
Richard J. Mannion et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2012)
Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Our Experience in 86 Consecutive Cases
Jae Chul Lee et al.
SPINE (2012)
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2
Jian Wang et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article
Michael Y. Wang et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2010)
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
Fan Shunwu et al.
SPINE (2010)
Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients 71 patients followed for 2-7 years
Thomas Andersen et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2009)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience
Constantin Schizas et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2009)
Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion for Revision Lumbar Surgery Technical Feasibility and Safety
Lee A. Selznick et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2009)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion
Eric B. Harris et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2008)
Minimally invasive spine surgery
Adam S. Kanter et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2008)
The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Lumbar Spine
Stewart M. Kerr et al.
OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS (2007)
Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability
Kai-Michael Scheufler et al.
NEUROSURGERY (2007)
Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach
Yung Park et al.
SPINE (2007)
Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine
Rudolf Beisse
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2006)
New percutaneously inserted spinal fixation system
GP Teitelbaum et al.
SPINE (2004)
Minimal access spinal technologies: state-of-the-art, indications, and techniques
R Assaker
JOINT BONE SPINE (2004)
Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: Is there a relationship to muscle retraction?
G Datta et al.
NEUROSURGERY (2004)
2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies:: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain -: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group
P Fritzell et al.
SPINE (2001)
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting
DF Stroup et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2000)
Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration
K Luoma et al.
SPINE (2000)
Share Paper
