4.7 Article

Comparison between the flow of two non-Newtonian fluids over an upper horizontal surface of paraboloid of revolution: Boundary layer analysis

Journal

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 1915-1929

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.08.002

Keywords

Casson and Williamson fluids; Free convection; Nonlinear thermal radiation; Paraboloid of revolution; Boundary layer flow; Quartic autocatalytic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boundary layer flow of two non-Newtonian fluids past an upper horizontal surface of a paraboloid of revolution (uhspr) in the presence of nonlinear thermal radiation is investigated. A new concept of parameterization is introduced to achieve comparison between the flows of both fluids (i.e. switch momentum governing equation from Williamson fluid to Casson fluid). In this study, it is assumed that buoyancy and stretching at the wall induce Casson and Williamson fluid flow over this kind of surface which is neither a perfect horizontal/vertical nor inclined/cone. Influence of space dependent internal heat source is accommodated in the energy equation. The case of unequal diffusion coefficients of reactants A and B (high concentration of catalyst on uhspr) is considered. Since chemical reactant B is of higher concentration at the surface more than the concept described as cubic autocatalytic, the suitable schemes are herein described as isothermal quartic autocatalytic reaction and first order reaction. A suitable similarity transformation is applied to reduce the governing equations to coupled ordinary differential equations. These equations along with the boundary conditions are solved numerically by using Runge-Kutta technique along with shooting method. Comparisons of the effects of some parameters on the flow profiles are illustrated graphically and discussed. (C) 2016 Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available