4.7 Article

A general micromechanical framework of effective moduli for the design of nonspherical nano- and micro-particle reinforced composites with interface properties

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 162-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.075

Keywords

Particle-reinforced composites; Interphase; Elastic properties; Anisotropy; Design

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Project of China [11402076]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project for Jiangsu Province [BK20130841]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016B06314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The morphological and physical properties of interfaces can significantly affect the overall mechanical properties of nano- and micro-particle reinforced composites. In this work, we devise a general micromechanical framework to predict the effective elastic moduli of particle-reinforced composites containing ellipsoidal nano or micro-particles with varying interface properties (e.g., both hard and soft). Specifically, the interface is treated as an interphase perfectly bonding the particle and matrix with a finite thickness and volume fraction. The morphological characteristics of the interface (e.g., volume fraction) are quantified using a statistical geometry approach and subsequently incorporated into the Mori-Tanaka average scheme with Eshelby's equivalent inclusion theory to derive the general micromechanical framework for the three-phase composites with non spherical inclusions. We show that our new framework leads to predictions of the elastic moduli of a wide spectrtun of nano- and micro-particle reinforced composites with both soft and hard interfaces to a reasonable accuracy by comparing with available experimental data and predictions from other theoretical frameworks. The general framework provides a robust and convenient predictive toolkit for composite design and evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available