4.5 Article

D-meson production in p-Pb collisions at √SNN=5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at √S=7 TeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054908

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grid centres
  2. Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) Collaboration
  3. State Committee of Science, Armenia
  4. World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia
  5. Swiss Fonds Kidagan, Armenia
  6. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil
  7. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP), Brazil
  8. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil
  9. Ministry of Science AMP
  10. Technology of China (MSTC)
  11. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  12. Ministry of Education of China (MOEC)
  13. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of Croatia, Croatia
  14. Unity through Knowledge Fund, Croatia
  15. Ministry of Education and Youth of the Czech Republic
  16. Danish Natural Science Research Council
  17. Carlsberg Foundation
  18. Danish National Research Foundation
  19. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme
  20. Helsinki Institute of Physics
  21. Academy of Finland
  22. French CNRS-IN2P3, France
  23. Region Pays de Loire, France
  24. Region Alsace, France
  25. Region Auvergne, France
  26. CEA, France
  27. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung
  28. Wissenschaft
  29. Forschung und Technologie (BMBF)
  30. Helmholtz Association
  31. General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Development, Greece
  32. National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH), Hungary
  33. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India
  34. Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Science and Technology of the Government of India
  35. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  36. Centro Fermi-Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi, Italy
  37. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Japan
  38. MEXT, Japan
  39. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  40. Consejo Nacional de Cienca y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Mexico
  41. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico
  42. Amerique Latine Formation academique-European Commission (ALFA-EC), Netherlands
  43. EPLANET Program (European Particle Physics Latin American Network), Netherlands
  44. Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), Netherlands
  45. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Netherlands
  46. Research Council of Norway (NFR)
  47. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru
  48. National Science Centre, Poland
  49. Ministry of National Education/Institute for Atomic Physics and National Council of Scientific Research in Higher Education (CNCSI-UEFISCDI), Romania
  50. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
  51. Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation
  52. Russian Academy of Sciences
  53. Russian Federal Agency of Atomic Energy
  54. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations
  55. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  56. Ministry of Education of Slovakia
  57. Department of Science and Technology, South Africa
  58. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT)
  59. E-Infrastructure shared between Europe and Latin America (EELA)
  60. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain
  61. Xunta de Galicia (Conselleria de Educacion)
  62. Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnologicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Cubaenergia, Cuba
  63. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
  64. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  65. Knut AMP
  66. Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW)
  67. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSDTA)
  68. Suranaree University of Technology (SUT)
  69. Office of the Higher Education Commission under NRU project of Thailand
  70. Ukraine Ministry of Education and Science
  71. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  72. United States Department of Energy
  73. United States National Science Foundation
  74. State of Texas
  75. State of Ohio
  76. STFC [ST/M00158X/1, ST/M00340X/1, ALICE, 2014 STFC Nuclear Physics CG, ST/M001601/1, ST/J000108/1, ST/N00261X/1, ST/L005751/1, ST/L005670/1, ST/M001598/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  77. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M00158X/1, ST/J000108/1, ST/L005751/1, 1371016, 2014 STFC Nuclear Physics CG, 1521430, ST/M001601/1, GRIDPP, ST/M00340X/1, ST/N00261X/1, ST/L005670/1, ALICE, 1523365, ST/M001598/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  78. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03664, 25287048, 15K17630, 26610071] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In the context of the investigation of the quark gluon plasma produced in heavy-ion collisions, hadrons containing heavy (charm or beauty) quarks play a special role for the characterization of the hot and dense medium created in the interaction. The measurement of the production of charm and beauty hadrons in proton-proton collisions, besides providing the necessary reference for the studies in heavy-ion reactions, constitutes an important test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) calculations. Heavy-flavor production in proton-nucleus collisions is sensitive to the various effects related to the presence of nuclei in the colliding system, commonly denoted cold-nuclear-matter effects. Most of these effects are expected to modify open-charm production at low transverse momenta (p(T)) and, so far, no measurement of D-meson production down to zero transverse momentum was available at mid-rapidity at the energies attained at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Purpose: The measurements of the production cross sections of promptly produced charmed mesons in p-Pb collisions at the LHC down to p(T) = 0 and the comparison to the results from pp interactions are aimed at the assessment of cold-nuclear-matter effects on open-charm production, which is crucial for the interpretation of the results from Pb-Pb collisions. The prompt charmed mesons D-0, D+, D*+, and D-s(+) were measured at mid-rapidity in p-Pb collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair root S-NN = 5.02 TeV with the ALICE detector at the LHC. D mesons were reconstructed from their decays D-0 -> K- pi(+), D+ -> K- pi(+) pi(+), D*+ -> D-0 pi(+), D-S(+) -> phi pi(+) -> K- K+ pi(+), and their charge conjugates, using an analysis method based on the selection of decay topologies displaced from the interaction vertex. In addition, the prompt D 0 production cross section was measured in pp collisions at root S = 7 TeV and p-Pb collisions at root S-NN = 5.02 TeV down to p(T) = 0 using an analysis technique that is based on the estimation and subtraction of the combinatorial background, without reconstruction of the D-0 decay vertex. Results: The production cross section in pp collisions is described within uncertainties by different implementations of pQCD calculations down to p(T) = 0. This allowed also a determination of the total c (c) over bar production cross section in pp collisions, which is more precise than previous ALICE measurements because it is not affected by uncertainties owing to the extrapolation to pT = 0. The nuclear modification factor R-pPb( p(T)), defined as the ratio of the p(T)-differential D meson cross section in p-Pb collisions and that in pp collisions scaled by the mass number of the Pb nucleus, was calculated for the four D-meson species and found to be compatible with unity within uncertainties. The results are compared to theoretical calculations that include cold-nuclear-matter effects and to transport model calculations incorporating the interactions of charm quarks with an expanding deconfined medium. Conclusions: These measurements add experimental evidence that the modification of the D-meson transverse momentum distributions observed in Pb-Pb collisions with respect to pp interactions is due to strong final-state effects induced by the interactions of the charm quarks with the hot and dense partonic medium created in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. The current precision of the measurement does not allow us to draw conclusions on the role of the different cold-nuclear-matter effects and on the possible presence of additional hot-medium effects in p-Pb collisions. However, the analysis technique without decay-vertex reconstruction, applied on future larger data samples, should provide access to the physics-rich range down to p(T) = 0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available