4.7 Article

Material transfer behavior of AgTiB2 and AgSnO2 electrical contact materials under different currents

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 139-148

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.056

Keywords

Ag base contact materials; Strengthening phase; Arc duration; Arc energy; Material transfer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274163]
  2. Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory [13JS076]
  3. Shaanxi Provincial Project of Special Foundation of Key Disciplines [2011HBSZS009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To clarify the effect of the characteristics of strengthening phase on the material transfer behavior of silver base contact materials, the good electrical and thermal-conductive TiB2 ceramic and insulating and poor thermal-conductive SnO2 ceramic were selected as the strengthening phases, and the Ag-4wt.% TiB2 and Ag-4wt.% SnO2 contact materials were prepared with different sized TiB2 and SnO2 powders by powder metallurgy. The electrical contact tests were performed on an electrical contact material testing system at a voltage of 12 V DC and a current ranging from 5 A to 24 A. The results show that the material transfer mode is from cathode to anode at small currents for the Ag-4wt.% TiB2 contact material. However, it changes reversely at large currents. For the Ag-4wt.% TiB2 contact materials prepared with 500 nm and 60 nm TiB2 powders, the critical current at which the material transfer mode changes are 16 A and 24 A, respectively. Nevertheless, the material transfer mode for the Ag-4wt.% SnO2 contact material is always from cathode to anode at 5-24 A. Furthermore, fine strengthening particles are beneficial for less mass loss and relative transfer mass for both Ag base contact materials. The Ag-4wt.% TiB2 contact material presents a lower relative transfer mass than Ag-4wt.% SnO2 contact material. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available