4.6 Article

Government Stakes as an Insurance Policy: Evidence from Seasoned Equity Offerings of Chinese Firms

Journal

EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 2292-2308

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1095558

Keywords

China; firm performance; government ownership; political connections; privatization; reverse privatization

Funding

  1. National Social Science Fund of China [11CGL019]
  2. Special Project Fund for Subject Construction in UIBE [Xk2014115]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in UIBE [CXTD5-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While privatization has attracted much more attention in the literature, one type of reverse privatization, a privately-controlled firm inviting government ownership as its minority shareholders, is neglected in the literature. Using large-scale census firm data from China, we investigate the determinants of this kind of reverse privatization and its impact on firm performance. We find that (1) the decision of reverse privatization by Chinese private firms is affected by local political risk, firm-level financial characteristics, and industry-level characteristics, (2) the reverse privatization significantly affects the firm's performance, which is measured in different proxies but the effects are not consistent, and (3) moreover, we find that the benefit of reverse privatization decreases as government ownership increases. Our results suggest that the prevalence of reverse privatization in China is a political outcome, which is affected by the trade-off of political risk and political privilege. Our work suggests that political risk and political considerations are the main driving factors of privatization, or its opposite, reverse privatization. Reverse privatization, to some extent, is a rational choice in some transition economies. Our findings offer clear policy implications to the nationalization phenomenon taking place around the world recently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available