4.0 Review

Both non-symbolic and symbolic quantity processing are important for arithmetical computation but not for mathematical reasoning

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 807-824

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1205074

Keywords

Approximate number system; mathematical cognition; arithmetical computation; mathematical reasoning

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB846100]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31521063, 31221003]
  3. Advanced Technology Innovation Center for Future Education, Beijing Normal University
  4. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z131107002213027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated whether numerical processing was important for two types of mathematical competence: arithmetical computation and mathematical reasoning. Thousand eight hundred and fifty-seven Chinese primary school children in third through sixth grades took eight computerised tasks: numerical processing (numerosity comparison, digit comparison), arithmetical computation, number series completion, non-verbal matrix reasoning, mental rotation, choice reaction time, and word rhyming. Hierarchical regressions showed that both non-symbolic numerical processing (numerosity comparison) and symbolic numerical processing (digit comparison) were independent predictors of arithmetical computation but neither was a predictor of mathematical reasoning (assessed by number series completion). These findings suggest that the cognitive basis of mathematical performance varies depending on the type of mathematical competence measured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available