4.7 Article

Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials

Journal

CRITICAL CARE
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2

Keywords

ARDS; Prone position; Neuromuscular blocking agents; Driving pressure; Compliance; Plateau pressure; Lung protective ventilation

Funding

  1. PHRC from the French ministry of health in France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Driving pressure (Delta Prs) across the respiratory system is suggested as the strongest predictor of hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We wonder whether this result is related to the range of tidal volume (VT). Therefore, we investigated.Prs in two trials in which strict lungprotective mechanical ventilation was applied in ARDS. Our working hypothesis was that.Prs is a risk factor for mortality just like compliance (Crs) or plateau pressure (Pplat, rs) of the respiratory system. Methods: We performed secondary analysis of data from 787 ARDS patients enrolled in two independent randomized controlled trials evaluating distinct adjunctive techniques while they were ventilated as in the low VT arm of the ARDSnet trial. For this study, we used VT, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pplat, rs, Crs,Delta Prs, and respiratory rate recorded 24 hours after randomization, and compared them between survivors and nonsurvivors at day 90. Patients were followed for 90 days after inclusion. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used for mortality at day 90. If colinearity between.Delta Prs, Crs, and Pplat, rs was verified, specific Cox models were used for each of them. Results: Both trials enrolled 805 patients of whom 787 had day-1 data available, and 533 of these survived. In the univariate analysis,Delta Prs averaged 13.7 +/- 3.7 and 12.8 +/- 3.7 cmH2O (P = 0.002) in nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively. Colinearity between Delta Prs, Crs and Pplat, rs, which was expected as these variables are mathematically coupled, was statistically significant. Hazard ratios from the Cox models for day-90 mortality were 1.05 (1.02-1.08) (P = 0.005), 1.05 (1.01-1.08) (P = 0.008) and 0.985 (0.972-0.985) (P = 0.029) for.Prs, Pplat, rs and Crs, respectively. PEEP and VT were not associated with death in any model. Conclusions: When ventilating patients with low VT,.Prs is a risk factor for death in ARDS patients, as is Pplat, rs or Crs. As our data originated from trials from which most ARDS patients were excluded due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, these findings must be validated in independent observational studies in patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available