4.6 Article

Common Misconceptions about Recycling

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1010-1017

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12355

Keywords

closed-loop; displacement; industrial Ecology; life cycle assessment; open-loop; recycling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems (CBET) grant [1335478]
  2. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (Cal Recycle)
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1335478] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1335478] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recycling of material resources lies at the heart of the industrial ecology (IE) metaphor. The very notion of the industrial ecosystem is motivated by the idea that we should learn from natural ecosystems how to close the loop. Recycling is not just central to IE, it is part of everyday life. Unfortunately, how the IE community and the public at large think about recycling includes several misconceptions that have the potential to misguide environmental assessments, policies, and actions that deal with recycling and thus undermine its environmental potential. One misconception stems from naive assumptions regarding recycled material displacing primary production. Two others assert the environmental advantages of recycling material multiple times, or at least in a closed loop. A final misconception is the assumption that the distinction between closed and open recycling loops is generally useful. This article explains why these misconceptions are flawed, discusses the implications, and presents an alternative set of principles to better harness the potential environmental benefits of closing material loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available