4.2 Article

Detailed energy model of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Net-Zero Energy Residential Test Facility: Development, modification, and validation

Journal

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 700-713

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2017.1381828

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology [60NANB14D318_0 CD-450, 60NANB14D318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Net-Zero Energy Residential Test Facility is a highly instrumented, highly configurable, single-family, net-zero energy house occupied by a virtual family of four. A detailed transient model of the Net-Zero Energy Residential Test Facility and the accompanying mechanical equipment was created using information available before construction; the model incorporated building geometric details and construction material properties, as well as manufacturers' specifications for HVAC, water heating, solar photovoltaic and other equipment. This model represents the typical design paradigm, where actual building performance and detailed equipment operation are not known. This original model underpredicted the measured annual energy consumption by 13.8%. The measured data were used to understand and correct the sources of error at the component level; modifications to the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning system, interior thermal capacitance, and domestic hot water system improved the energy consumption prediction to within 1.6% of measured data. The differences between the original and modified models are useful for understanding the sources, magnitudes, and possible corrections to errors in energy models for high-efficiency residences. The modified model will be used in future studies of alternative energy system configurations and control strategies, contributing to cost-effective and optimum design of net-zero energy houses in America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available