4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of 304 stainless steel/Q235 carbon steel composite material

Journal

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 529-534

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.050

Keywords

Stainless steel; Carbon steel; Anti-corrosion; Conductivity; Electrochemical; EIS

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51174160]
  2. Dr. Start-up funds of Xi'an University of Technology, Science Research Project of Xi'an University of Technology [2015TS001]
  3. Key Laboratory Project of Education Department of Shaanxi Province [15JS080]
  4. Science and Technology Co-ordination & Innovation Key Laboratory Project of Shaanxi Province [2014SZS09-Z02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composite material of 304 stainless steel reinforced Q235 carbon steel has been prepared by modified hot-rolling process. The resulted material was characterized by scanning electron microscope, three-electrode method, fault current impact method, electrochemical potentiodynamic polarization curve measurement and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results showed that metallurgical bond between the stainless steel layer and carbon steel substrate has been formed. The composite material exhibited good electrical conductivity and thermal stability. The average grounding resistance of the composite material was about 13/20 of dip galvanized steel. There has no surface crack and bubbling formed after fault current impact. The composite material led to a significant decrease in the corrosion current density in soil solution, compared with that of hot dip galvanized steel and bare carbon steel. On the basis polarization curve and EIS analyses, it can be concluded that the composite material showed improved anti-corrosion property than hot-dip galvanized steel. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available