4.6 Article

Effectiveness of infliximab in refractory FDG PET-positive sarcoidosis

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 175-185

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00227014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. St Antonius Hospital innovation fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inconclusive evidence for the efficacy of infliximab in sarcoidosis hinders the global use of this potentially beneficial drug. To study infliximab efficacy in a clinical setting, we performed a prospective open-label trial in patients refractory to conventional treatment. Patients (n=56) received eight infusions of 5 mg.kg(-1) infliximab. Pulmonary function, disease activity measured by F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) by positron emission tomography (PET) and quality of life were part of the clinical work-up. Infliximab levels were measured before every infusion. After 26 weeks of infliximab treatment, mean improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) was 6.6% predicted (p=0.0007), whereas in the 6 months before start of treatment, lung function decreased. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of pulmonary parenchyma on F-18-FDG PET decreased by 3.93 (p<0.0001). High SUVmax of pulmonary parenchyma at baseline predicted FVC improvement (R=0.62, p=0.0004). An overall beneficial response was seen in 79% of patients and a partial response was seen in 17% of patients. No correlation between infliximab trough level (mean 18.0 mu g.mL(-1)) and initial response was found. In conclusion, infliximab causes significant improvement in FVC in refractory F-18-FDG PET positive sarcoidosis. Especially in pulmonary disease, high F-18-FDG PET SUVmax values at treatment initiation predict clinically relevant lung function improvement. These results suggest that inclusion of F-18-FDG PET is useful in therapeutic decision-making in complex sarcoidosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available