4.7 Article

On-chip polarization splitter based on a multimode plasmonic waveguide

Journal

PHOTONICS RESEARCH
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 47-53

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.6.000047

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11674014, 61475005, 11527901, 11134001]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0203500, 2013CB328704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The miniaturization of polarization beam splitters (PBSs) is vital for ultradense chip-scale photonic integrated circuits. However, the small PBSs based on complex hybrid plasmonic structures exhibit large fabrication difficulties or high insertion losses. Here, by designing a bending multimode plasmonic waveguide, an ultrabroadband on-chip plasmonic PBS with low insertion losses is numerically and experimentally realized. The multimode plasmonic waveguide, consisting of a metal strip with a V-shaped groove on the metal surface, supports the symmetric and antisymmetric surface plasmon polariton (SPP) waveguide modes in nature. Due to the different field confinements of the two SPP waveguide modes, which result in different bending losses, the two incident SPP waveguide modes of orthogonal polarization states are efficiently split in the bending multimode plasmonic waveguide. The numerical simulations show that the operation bandwidth of the proposed PBS is as large as 430 nm because there is no resonance or interference effect in the splitting process. Compared with the complex hybrid plasmonic structure, the simple bending multimode plasmonic waveguide is much easier to fabricate. In the experiment, a broadband (Delta lambda approximate to 120 nm) and low-insertion-loss (< 3 dB with a minimum insertion loss of 0.7 dB) PBS is demonstrated by using the strongly confined waveguide modes as the incident sources in the bending multimode plasmonic waveguide. (C) 2017 Chinese Laser Press

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available