4.6 Article

Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts

Journal

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 431-455

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.08.002

Keywords

Risk; Managerial preferences; Agency conflicts; Acquisitions

Funding

  1. Brandywine Global Investment Management Research Fellowship
  2. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines managers' incentive to play it safe. We find that, after managers are insulated by the adoption of an antitakeover law, they take value-destroying actions that reduce their firms' stock volatility and risk of distress. To illustrate one such action, we show that managers undertake diversifying acquisitions that target firms likely to reduce risk, have negative announcement returns, and are concentrated among firms with managers who gain the most from reducing risk. Our findings suggest that instruments typically used to motivate managers, such as greater financial leverage and larger ownership stakes, exacerbate risk-related agency challenges. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available