4.5 Article

Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation

Journal

COGNITION
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 61-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.012

Keywords

Mental simulation; Physical reasoning; Probabilistic simulation; Inference; Learning

Funding

  1. Berkeley Fellowship
  2. NSF
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0341]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After observing a collision between two boxes, you can immediately tell which is empty and which is full of books based on how the boxes moved. People form rich perceptions about the physical properties of objects from their interactions, an ability that plays a crucial role in learning about the physical world through our experiences. Here, we present three experiments that demonstrate people's capacity to reason about the relative masses of objects in naturalistic 3D scenes. We find that people make accurate inferences, and that they continue to fine-tune their beliefs over time. To explain our results, we propose a cognitive model that combines Bayesian inference with approximate knowledge of Newtonian physics by estimating probabilities from noisy physical simulations. We find that this model accurately predicts judgments from our experiments, suggesting that the same simulation mechanism underlies both peoples' predictions and inferences about the physical world around them. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available