4.7 Article

Shaft Generator System Design and Ship Operation Improvement Involving SFOC Minimization, Electric Grid Conditioning, and Auxiliary Propulsion

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2016.2614999

Keywords

Back-to-back converters; more electric ship; permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG); salient pole synchronous generator (SPSG); shaft generator (SHG)

Funding

  1. European and Hellenic National resources (ESPA-Thalis projects) [MIS: 380164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the design and application of an improved shaft generator (SHG) system for an actual Ro-Ro ship, comprising a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) and a back-to-back converter. The system can operate both in generator and motoring mode, providing active power and ancillary services to the ship's grid, and driving the main shaft under emergency conditions, respectively. Although the literature in the design and optimization of the individual components is vast, the subsystems and their interactions should be studied in tandem in order to accurately evaluate the benefits of implementing such solutions in real-world applications. This paper begins by investigating and improving the design of subsystems, i.e., machine and power converter control, and then evaluates system operation under various conditions. A conventional high-speed salient-pole synchronous generator and a low-speed direct-driven PMSG are investigated. These are then geometrically optimized, based on the specified operating characteristics. Controller design is optimized, and system operation is evaluated under steady-state and transient modes. It is demonstrated that the proposed SHG can provide important grid services, act as an emergency thrust mechanism and lead to a 3% reduction in fuel consumption for a typical voyage compared with a conventional SHG system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available