4.6 Article

THE ATACAMA COSMOLOGY TELESCOPE: THE POLARIZATION-SENSITIVE ACTPol INSTRUMENT

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 227, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21

Keywords

cosmic background radiation; instrumentation: polarimeters

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [AST-0408698, AST-0965625]
  2. Princeton University
  3. University of Pennsylvania
  4. Cornell University
  5. Wilkinson Fund
  6. NASA [NNX13AE56G, NNX14AB58G, NNX12AM32H]
  7. NASA
  8. CONICYT [FONDECYT 1141113, Anillo ACT-1417]
  9. STFC [ST/K000926/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1440226] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) makes high angular resolution measurements of anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) at millimeter wavelengths. We describe ACTPol, an upgraded receiver for ACT, which uses feedhorn-coupled, polarization-sensitive detector arrays, a 3 degrees field of view, 100 mK cryogenics with continuous cooling, and meta material antireflection coatings. ACTPol comprises three arrays with separate cryogenic optics: two arrays at a central frequency of 148 GHz and one array operating simultaneously at both 97 GHz and 148 GHz. The combined instrument sensitivity, angular resolution, and sky coverage are optimized for measuring angular power spectra, clusters via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) and kinetic SZ signals, and CMB lensing due to large-scale structure. The receiver was commissioned with its first 148 GHz array in 2013, observed with both 148 GHz arrays in 2014, and has recently completed its first full season of operations with the full suite of three arrays. This paper provides an overview of the design and initial performance of the receiver and related systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available