4.8 Review

Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research

Journal

MICROBIOME
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5

Keywords

Metagenomics; 16S rRNA gene; Shotgun metagenomics; Environmental contamination; Methods; Study design; Best practices

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [P30 AI 045008, T32 AI007632]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL113252]
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Health SAP [4100068710]
  4. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Career Development Award [3276]
  5. National Institutes of Health [1T32DK101371-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available