4.7 Article

Terrestrial ecosystem process model Biome-BGCMuSo v4.0: summary of improvements and new modeling possibilities

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 4405-4437

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-4405-2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [MTA PD 450012]
  2. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA K104816]
  3. BioVeL project (Biodiversity Virtual e-Laboratory Project) [FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2011-2, 283359]
  4. EU FP7 WHEALBI Project [613556]
  5. Croatian Science Foundation Installation Research Project EFFEctivity [HRZZ-UIP-11-2013-2492]
  6. metaprogramme Adaptation of Agriculture and Forests to Climate Change (AAFCC) of the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The process-based biogeochemical model Biome-BGC was enhanced to improve its ability to simulate carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles of various terrestrial ecosystems under contrasting management activities. Biome-BGC version 4.1.1 was used as a base model. Improvements included addition of new modules such as the multilayer soil module, implementation of processes related to soil moisture and nitrogen balance, soil-moisture-related plant senescence, and phenological development. Vegetation management modules with annually varying options were also implemented to simulate management practices of grasslands (mowing, grazing), croplands (ploughing, fertilizer application, planting, harvesting), and forests (thinning). New carbon and nitrogen pools have been defined to simulate yield and soft stem development of herbaceous ecosystems. The model version containing all developments is referred to as Biome-BGCMuSo (Biome-BGC with multilayer soil module; in this paper, Biome-BGCMuSo v4.0 is documented). Case studies on a managed forest, cropland, and grassland are presented to demonstrate the effect of model developments on the simulation of plant growth as well as on carbon and water balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available