4.5 Review

Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis research Foundation
  2. Labex DEEP (part of the IDEX Idex PSL) [ANR-11-LBX-0044, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL]
  3. ERC [250367]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [250367] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniques are conceptually and technically different and comparing their results is not trivial. Here, we discuss both 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH approaches to highlight their similarities and differences. We then describe the technical biases that affect each approach, and review the available reports that address their compatibility. Finally, we propose an experimental scheme for comparison of 3C and DNA FISH results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available