4.7 Article

Free DICOM de-identification tools in clinical research: functioning and safety of patient privacy

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 3685-3695

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3794-0

Keywords

DICOM Freeware Tools; Patient Data Privacy; Anonymisation and Pseudonymisation; Data Protection; Anonymous Testing

Funding

  1. ZonMw Innovative Medical Devices Initiative (IMDI) [104002003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare non-commercial DICOM toolkits for their de-identification ability in removing a patient's personal health information (PHI) from a DICOM header. Ten DICOM toolkits were selected for de-identification tests. Tests were performed by using the system's default de-identification profile and, subsequently, the tools' best adjusted settings. We aimed to eliminate fifty elements considered to contain identifying patient information. The tools were also examined for their respective methods of customization. Only one tool was able to de-identify all required elements with the default setting. Not all of the toolkits provide a customizable de-identification profile. Six tools allowed changes by selecting the provided profiles, giving input through a graphical user interface (GUI) or configuration text file, or providing the appropriate command-line arguments. Using adjusted settings, four of those six toolkits were able to perform full de-identification. Only five tools could properly de-identify the defined DICOM elements, and in four cases, only after careful customization. Therefore, free DICOM toolkits should be used with extreme care to prevent the risk of disclosing PHI, especially when using the default configuration. In case optimal security is required, one of the five toolkits is proposed. aEuro cent Free DICOM toolkits should be carefully used to prevent patient identity disclosure. aEuro cent Each DICOM tool produces its own specific outcomes from the de-identification process. aEuro cent In case optimal security is required, using one DICOM toolkit is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available