4.7 Article

Prevalence of degenerative and spondyloarthritis-related magnetic resonance imaging findings in the spine and sacroiliac joints in patients with persistent low back pain

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 1191-1203

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3903-0

Keywords

Low back pain; Spondyloarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sacroiliac joint; Bone marrow

Funding

  1. Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Post Graduate Education
  2. Danish Rheumatism Association
  3. Region of Southern Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To estimate the prevalence of degenerative and spondyloarthritis (SpA)-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and analyse their association with gender and age in persistent low back pain (LBP) patients. Methods Degenerative and SpA-related MRI findings in the whole spine and SIJs were evaluated in Spine Centre patients aged 18-40 years with LBP. Results Among the 1,037 patients, the prevalence of disc degeneration, disc contour changes and vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes were 87 % (+/- SEM 1.1), 82 % (+/- 1.2) and 48 % (+/- 1.6). All degenerative spinal findings were most frequent in men and patients aged 30-40 years. Spinal SpA-related MRI findings were rare. In the SIJs, 28 % (+/- 1.4) had at least one MRI finding, with bone marrow oedema being the most common (21 % (+/- 1.3)). SIJ erosions were most prevalent in patients aged 18-29 years and bone marrow oedema in patients aged 30-40 years. SIJ sclerosis and fatty marrow deposition were most common in women. SIJ bone marrow oedema, sclerosis and erosions were most frequent in women indicating pregnancy-related LBP. Conclusion The high prevalence of SIJ MRI findings associated with age, gender, and pregnancy-related LBP need further investigation of their clinical importance in LBP patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available