4.5 Review

Making the Most of In Vitro Tests to Diagnose Food Allergy

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.003

Keywords

In vitro tests; Diagnosis; Food allergy; Specific IgE; Basophil activation test; Component-resolved diagnosis; IgG4/IgE ratio; Specific/total IgE ratio; Peptide microarray; T-cell assay

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council through MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship [MR/M008517/1]
  2. Asthma UK [MRC-Asthma UK Centre, MRC-AsthmaUKCentre] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M008517/1, G0902018, G1000758B, G1000758] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0902018, MR/M008517/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various in vitro tests assess different aspects of the underlying immune mechanism of IgE-mediated food allergy. Some can be used for diagnostic purposes; specific IgE to allergen extracts is widely available; specific IgE to allergen components is used in most specialist centers, and the basophil activation test is becoming increasingly used clinically. IgE to allergen peptides, T-cell assays, allergen-specific/total IgE ratios, and allergenspecific IgG4/IgE ratios are currently reserved for research. Different factors can modulate the likelihood of IgE-mediated food allergy of a given allergy test result, namely, the patients' age, ethnicity, previous allergic reaction to the identified food, concomitant atopic conditions, and geographical location, and need to be taken into account when interpreting the allergy test results in the clinic. The importance of the specific food, the clinical resources available, and patient preferences are additional aspects that need to be considered when deciding whether an oral food challenge is required to reach an accurate diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available