4.5 Article

Analysis of the Spatial Variation of Network-Constrained Phenomena Represented by a Link Attribute Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6020044

Keywords

network-constrained; points of interests; hierarchical Bayesian model; attribute-based method; local indicators of network-constrained clusters (LINCS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601407, 41371377, 91546106, 41601428]
  2. Shenzhen Future Industry Development Funding Program [201507211219247860]
  3. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Land and Resources [KF-2016-02-011, KF-2016-02-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spatial variation of geographical phenomena is a classical problem in spatial data analysis and can provide insight into underlying processes. Traditional exploratory methods mostly depend on the planar distance assumption, but many spatial phenomena are constrained to a subset of Euclidean space. In this study, we apply a method based on a hierarchical Bayesian model to analyse the spatial variation of network-constrained phenomena represented by a link attribute in conjunction with two experiments based on a simplified hypothetical network and a complex road network in Shenzhen that includes 4212 urban facility points of interest (POIs) for leisure activities. Then, the methods named local indicators of network-constrained clusters (LINCS) are applied to explore local spatial patterns in the given network space. The proposed method is designed for phenomena that are represented by attribute values of network links and is capable of removing part of random variability resulting from small-sample estimation. The effects of spatial dependence and the base distribution are also considered in the proposed method, which could be applied in the fields of urban planning and safety research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available