4.5 Article

A Post-Rectification Approach of Depth Images of Kinect v2 for 3D Reconstruction of Indoor Scenes

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6110349

Keywords

camera calibration; Kinect v2; reflectivity-related depth error; simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM); time-of-flight

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0502002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61401040]
  3. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Young Special Scientific Research Innovation Plan [2016RCGD11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D reconstruction of indoor scenes is a hot research topic in computer vision. Reconstructing fast, low-cost, and accurate dense 3D maps of indoor scenes have applications in indoor robot positioning, navigation, and semantic mapping. In other studies, the Microsoft Kinect for Windows v2 (Kinect v2) is utilized to complete this task, however, the accuracy and precision of depth information and the accuracy of correspondence between the RGB and depth (RGB-D) images still remain to be improved. In this paper, we propose a post-rectification approach of the depth images to improve the accuracy and precision of depth information. Firstly, we calibrate the Kinect v2 with a planar checkerboard pattern. Secondly, we propose a post-rectification approach of the depth images according to the reflectivity-related depth error. Finally, we conduct tests to evaluate this post-rectification approach from the perspectives of accuracy and precision. In order to validate the effect of our post-rectification approach, we apply it to RGB-D simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) in an indoor environment. Experimental results show that once our post-rectification approach is employed, the RGB-D SLAM system can perform a more accurate and better visual effect 3D reconstruction of indoor scenes than other state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available